Showing posts with label Football. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Football. Show all posts

Monday, February 2, 2015

The Quintessential QB and Executive John Elway



John Elway was the quintessential comeback QB, and was a great study in competitiveness and persistence.  Playing for the Denver Broncos all of his career (1983 - 1999), he led the team to three Super Bowl appearances in 1987, 1988 and 1990 but lost each game.  There were some lean years, and missed playoffs, until the Broncos arrived at the big dance again in 1998.  This time, Elway & Co. punched the ticket and nabbed the Lombardi Trophy.  They returned the next year, and made it two in a row, after which Mr. Comeback called it a career.  What an amazing career it was, indeed.

It is quite a challenge for many star athletes and talented coaches to parlay their success into the executive ranks.  Consider Michael Jordan, and his woeful Charlotte Hornets.  Think Isiah Thomas, who was a fiasco as coach and executive.  Even Phil Jackson, one of the greatest coaches in NBA history and now rookie executive, is having a miserable go with the New York Knicks.  They either have to have the requisite front office leadership presence, skills and disposition, or be able to learn and develop these, in order to be successful.

Unfortunately, one of the most glaring pitfalls for any organization is to elevate a great performer to the next position and expect him or her to sustain such high level of performance.  Perhaps seduced by the recognition and promotion, he or she, too, believes that current skills can translate to a future challenge.  Again, unless they have the stuff to succeed in a new, more complicated position, they are bound to fail.

Fortunately for the Broncos, however, Elway has certainly proven that he possesses the savvy, moxie and discipline.  Under his four year, front office watch, his team boasts a 46-18 record, first place finishes in the AFC West every single year, plus yet another Super Bowl appearance for the quintessential leading edge executive.

Saturday, September 20, 2014

Roger Goodell isn't going anywhere


This should be the final straw for NFL's robotic Roger Goodell
Going into Friday's news conference in New York, the question was whether Roger Goodell would resign. Coming out of it, the question is whether he will be fired.

Not likely. This corporate employee served well his corporate bosses, the 32 NFL owners.

They were probably thrilled with his performance. Most of the rest of the free world was appalled. The reviews ranged from disappointment to horror. If this had been a Broadway play, the theater's doors would be closing right now.
I understood better why Goodell was still in office, several days after the Ray Rice fiasco erupted like a volcano that evidently neither he nor the NFL was equipped to control.  Alex Grossman posted the article above, and I commented in response to a telling point from Leo Sanchez:
Even if Goodell leaves his position, which I seriously doubted. That's not going to solve the domestic violence situation..!!
You're right, domestic violence is a much bigger, more complicated problem than even the mighty NFL can handle, with or without Goodell. But I very much agree that he has to go: He has great business acumen, but he is incompetent as a leader and is morally suspect. I am astounded that despite what's obvious to us, owners have not spoken out against him. In fact the handful who have spoken out are supportive of him. What I think is this: He's done a lot of good for these owners (i.e., made boatloads of money), and in the process he's curried personal favors with many of them. So all that said, I just don't see Goodell leaving. The question about whether he was resigning, during the press conference, was a silly one: If your salary was $44 million a year, would you just resign? So the resolution to the terrible mess the NFL created will not come from Goodell, his lame apologies and promises notwithstanding, or anyone from within the NFL. Federal and-or local authorities have to step in with real subpoena and arrest powers. Otherwise how many more women and children have been harmed, or will be harmed, by how many more players we haven't heard about, yet? I mean, if anyone of us did what Ray Rice did to Janay Palmer, we'd have our asses sitting in jail!

Realizing things about Roger Goodell



Friday, September 19, 2014

Can't any football team just get it right?


Jameis Winston is the standout QB for Florida State University, and he has a pockmark history of behaving badly:

Jameis Winston to sit whole game

At first FSU suspended Winston for half a game, the first half in particular.  I was, like, Are you kidding me?  It was a mockery of a punishment, and I couldn't believe that ESPN Robert Smith tried to justify it.

So I chimed in:


Thursday, September 18, 2014

A Tampa Bay embarrassment in Atlanta


I had finished my work after a good, long day, and I wanted to relax with some Thursday Night Football.  I was in for a disappointment:


Lovie Smith coached the Chicago Bears from 2004 to 2012, and was fired even after finishing the year at 10 - 6.  He struggled in his first year, but managed to be the first African American head coach to reach the Super Bowl in his third season (2006 - 2007).  That was clearly the pinnacle of his career with the Bears, as the next six years brought mediocrity back.  His defensive prowess was matched by his offensive ineptitude, so despite bringing in a franchise QB in Jay Cutler, the Bears couldn't come anywhere near that pinnacle again.

Smith didn't coach for a year, then the Buccaneers hired him to change a losing culture down there in Tampa Bay:

Lovie Smith deserves to be vilified after embarrassing loss to Falcons

Clearly that ain't happening anytime soon.

Friday, September 5, 2014

Will Dan Snyder Cave on Redskins Name?


Washington Redskins

I posted this note on Google+, and had a conversation with a friend Robert Cooper:

Does anybody else beside me think that it's just a matter of when (not if) Washington owner Dan Snyder will cave on the team name?
Dan Synder will NEVER cave, the reasons why are the Billions in his bank account and the millions the organization makes every year. The piles of money around his ears are two thick for him to hear the complaints of poor people. Until the name begins to take money from his pocket there will be nothing different. 
But it's a pretty marked brand now, isn't it. I imagine sponsorship money, media deals, merchandise sales etc. will soften, if they haven't yet, and Snyder has to cave. I know changing the name and logo is a multimillion dollar process, but he can take a stand and be a part of stemming the tide of discrimination. I'm sure the matter will become more and more of a distraction to his team, and that will be a shame. 
This battle has been going on for more than a decade. Mechandise salea haven't dipped because Synder keeps bringing flashly players who's uniforms fly off the store shelves, the attendance for home games remain sellouts and he likely has a cable contract that rakes in $. If Pepsi wants to stand agaist his name he'll simply bring Coke into the stadium. Bottom line he holds the cards and weilds the power, outside of the NFL league offices demanding the change don't hope for anything differnt to happen. 
Hmm, I see... There is a divide between (a) people who care about the name and its meaning and (b) people who don't and focus on football and the team. 
It seems to me the majority of hardcore NFL fans don't have a problem with the name, the ones that do will go so far as stating the franchise should be renamed and rebranded but these same folks would never boycott a game or demand their team not to play against Washington after change took place.  
Making matters even worse is not even all the native American Indians tribes are on the same page about being outraged, offended or even concerned about the name. 
With recent high profile incidents of discrimination, I was thinking there would be a groundswell of protest against Snyder & Co. But perhaps if a similar incident involving American Indians occurs, then...
in the US people will protest against the procedure to put on a pair of socks. LOL, too many in this nation just want to fight about something. 
lol ... I definitely don't advocate fighting for fighting's sake. 

Wednesday, September 3, 2014

Super Bowl for Seahawks no More or Less Tough


Super Bowl champion Seattle Seahawks finish a strong pre-season

Sports Illustrated Peter King speaks with conventional wisdom here (i.e., drawing on history) - Why the NFL’s Best Team Won’t Win the Super Bowl - but it's based on flawed logic.

In general, of course, it's tough for any team in any sport to win a championship. But unlike other major sports, football has one of the longest off-seasons (7-8 months). So removing the argument of wear-and-tear from a deep run in the playoffs, the Seahawks have just as good a chance to win the Super Bowl this year, as they did last year. In other words, just because they won it all last year, it doesn't make it any tougher, or less tough, to win it this year.

But the question remains: Will they win this year? The real answer is: No one knows. Moreover, no one knows that they won't, either (rf. King's flawed logic). But that said, here's another argument: Like any team going into a post-Super Bowl season, the Seahawks have a very effective, very recent "template" for winning. No other team in the NFL has that effective, recent template at their disposal. Can they apply it again this year? Of course they can! The challenge is how they adjust and strengthen that template for a new season, where the elite teams will be gunning for their backs.

By the way, the Ravens underwent way too many changes in their team, and it was too much for them to adjust their Super Bowl template. So they fell easily by the wayside in 2013-2014.

The Seahawks looked pretty strong in the preseason. In that last game, for example, Russell Wilson & Co. made the 2014 Bears defense (so far) look like the 2013 Bears defense. So with their proven template firmly on hand, I'd say they are an odds-on favorite to win this year.
Any team trying to repeat has a hard time, as for many teams playing them their game against Seattle will be their superbowl game, every opponent Seattle has will have their game against them marked well in advance, so dificult to repeat. 
Yep, I think teams will be very motivated to play the Seahawks, but whether they will actually beat the champs is another matter altogether. Again the challenge for the Seahawks is to elevate their game accordingly, which means adjusting and strengthening their championship template. It'll definitely be tough for them to win it all this year, but it'll no more or less so than winning it all last year. 
 

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

What Cancer Reminds Even the Best of Athletes


Damian Strohmeyer/SI
Former Buffalo Bills QB Jim Kelly
Reference: 'Must Keep the Faith.'

Cancer reminds us that even the best of athletes is human, after all.  And were inviolably mortal.  

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Mark Cuban NFL Criticisms in Perspective (2)


NFL Owners
I posted the following on Google+:

Reference: Cuban: NFL issues go beyond TV.

Mark Cuban's accusation of greed has met with sarcasm and denouncement, but I urge NFL owners to heed it, even if only in the private, behind-closed-doors reflections and conversations they have. You see, greed is a subjective, very personal criticism, and who's to say really whether or not it's warranted in the NFL case?

But to the extent that success - and the NFL is arguably the most towering success story in professional sports - makes owners lose touch with more latent market trends and even with their soul or conscience, then they put themselves in a dangerous position for the future. Think Kodak, Borders. Think Enron, AltaVista. Think Nokia, Motorola. Think of scores of investors around the world, who in the middle of the last decade, thought the heyday of moneymaking stretched into infinity.

For his loudmouth and occasional irreverence, Cuban is an astute businessman. Again, he may - or may not - be right about the impending NFL implosion. But trouble is afoot, even as it revels in its popularity and riches, and unless its owners do some honest, hard-wrought soul-searching and some honest, behind-the-obvious look at their business, they may themselves, perhaps unwittingly, prove Cuban right. 


Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Monday, March 24, 2014

Mark Cuban NFL Criticisms in Perspective (1)


Mark Cuban
I posted the following on Google+:
Just watch. Pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered. When you try to take it too far, people turn the other way. I'm just telling you, when you've got a good thing and you get greedy, it always, always, always, always, always turns on you. That's rule No. 1 of business.
Reference: Cuban: With TV deal, NFL is 'hoggy.'

There is no way to be certain about the future (i.e., not until we make time travel a reality). So Mark Cuban may - or may not - be right about the NFL imploding in the next decade. But for sure what he is doing in the present is stirring the pot. Remember, he's an NBA owner, who has just taken one of the boldest competitive steps I know: Cross the line into another sport, and deign to get on the gridiron with big, money-muscled owners.

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

CBS-NFL Cash In on Thursday Night Football



Ratings show that football audience has not had a surfeit of games on TV.  So it makes perfect sense for a major network like CBS to pony up millions of dollars to the NFL, with their eyes specifically on Thursday Night football.  I know there was talk that perhaps the league ought to strike a deal for two games on Thursday Night, but that remains to be seen.

I have eschewed blockbuster, long-term contracts for athletes, just because there is so much unknown in the healthy, longevity and performance in any of them.  In this vein, it seems, this CBS-NFL is just a one-year deal, as Scott Milleisen explains that sports bigwigs want options at their disposal, which long-term deals fundamentally take away.

What these sports leagues and teams do are definitely major lessons in business.  

Reference: How The CBS Thursday Night NFL Deal Benefits Both Sides.

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Friday, February 21, 2014

NFL Locker Room a Microcosm of Society at Large


Dolphins owner Stephen Ross called the Ted Wells report 'deeply disturbing.' (USATSI)
Miami Dolphins owner Stephen Ross

Reference: Dolphins owner Stephen Ross calls Ted Wells report 'disturbing'.

Bullying: What happened in the locker room is just a sampling of what happens in broader society. "Disturbing," definitely, Mr. Ross.  

The pull for the NFL and the front office of every team is to set stricter policy, police and enforce it, and otherwise castigate any perpetrator of bullying in the locker room.  Yes, bullying must be stopped.  But for the NFL to use its considerable might in its efforts to do so makes me think Are you kidding me, seriously?

Bullying or tormenting, prejudice and discrimination, and flat out hate and misconduct are the stuff of American culture and humankind in general.  So as with sports leagues and regulatory bodies' efforts to tamp out the use of Performance Enhancing Drugs, officials can control it only to some degree.  Unless the fundamental problem is adequately understood, and its causes sufficiently illuminated, it will persist and it will taunt any posturing of control that these officials do.    

Don't get me wrong: I believe policy must be reviewed, strengthened, and implemented.  But to believe, and expect, that it will resolve the issue is foolhardy.  These social problems have plagued American culture for decades and decades, so don't expect that the NFL will break from this long stretch of failure and suddenly be the paradigm of a tolerant, accepting organization.  

I suggest that each team promote dialogue among its players, coaches and personnel, and that the NFL provide whatever support and encouragement it can, in this effort.  This is not an easy thing, so teams are likely to need to confident, capable facilitators in that dialogue.  

The aim, first and foremost, is to seek to understand, before being understood.  Allow people's concerns, beliefs, attitudes and motives to surface.  

From that understanding, answers to how these issues can be resolved will emerge.  Misbehavior can be addressed accordingly within the private confines of each team's circle, again with NFL guidance and support.  

This will take a long time, and no doubt progress toward a more tolerant organization will be quite rocky.  For example, expect that the Incognito-Martin scandal will not be the last one.  

But the right mindset and approach will eventually resolve such issues.  

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Review and Reactions to Incognito-Martin Report


At the heels of the publication of the NFL report on February 15th 2014, I posted Incognito, others tormented Martin and following articles on Google+, and commented:

Incognito wasn't the only perpetrator, and Martin wasn't the only victim, in the Dolphins locker room.
Richie Incognito and Jonathan Martin
Three starters on the Miami Dolphins' offensive line -- Richie Incognito, John Jerry and Mike Pouncey -- engaged in a "pattern of harassment" directed at Jonathan Martin, as well as another young offensive lineman and an assistant trainer.
Reference: Ted Wells releases Miami Dolphins misconduct report.
Tedy Bruschi and Darren Woodson react to Ted Wells' report about Jonathan Martin leaving the Dolphins because of harassment.
Reference: No Room for Bullying, Harassment.
Adam Schefter breaks down the impact of the Ted Wells' report on Richie Incognito and Jonathan Martin's futures in the NFL.
Reference: NFL Futures for Incognito and Martin.

On the face of it, the report is most damning of Incognito, and his return to the NFL is in serious question.  ESPN Mike Golic, however, wondered if Martin would have the greater difficulty in resuming his career.  The fact that he walked out of the locker room is a major no-no among men of the gridiron.

I suspect, though, that when all the muck has settled, they will find roster spots on teams other than the Dolphins.  That is, if they truly want to, and if they convince prospective teams that they're willing and able to play football again.  American culture has a way of forgiving, if not forgetting, such scandals.  There is a measure of truth, then, in the old adage that time heals all wounds.

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Monday, February 17, 2014

Richie Incognito is who we thought he is


Richie Incognito
I posted Incognito goes on Twitter tirade on Google+ on February 13th 2014, and commented, and it generated a bit of an exchange with a friend:

ESPN Michael Wilbon: Richie Incognito is who we thought he is... a creep! 
A creep, yes, but we still don't know the full story. Martin might be just as much of a creep, just a quieter one.
Exactly. We're supposed to get the investigation report soon.
It is taking an awfully long time. I wonder how it's being massaged?
If I remember correctly, the NFL stepped in, a few weeks after the story broke, and told the Dolphins owner to hold off on meeting Martin. The NFL is a marketing and political machine, and has the clout and cash to ensure that it remains so, for the long haul. The Incognito-Martin tale is far different from the players' concussion tragedy, but I think they're both socially explosive issues and therefore a threat to that machinery. "Massage" is a polite word, but it's the best one to use about what the NFL is probably doing with this investigation. All that said, the irony is, Incognito is right: The truth will come out in one way or another, and Martin will have to hold himself up to the public eye, too.

The very next day, on February 14th 2014, the NFL released its report.

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Friday, February 7, 2014

Did Peyton Manning switch `Omaha! to `Des Moines?


(image credit)
What impressed me the most about Seahawks D: (3) takeaway mentality, (2) run-after-catch stops, (1) speed off the snap.
Me too!
Yep. The Seahawks as a team put on a football clinic for the Broncos. 
It was crazy!
Yep, I was hoping to see a competitive football game. But the Seahawks were just so crazy-good, they were stunning to watch. I kept thinking... every Bears player and coach ought to be watching this! 
I was too. It was over before it began on the first snap! I was like WOW! They can't do anything! The Omaha didn't even work..Haha.. 
I don't know, maybe Manning changed it all up, and was saying Des Moines, Des Moines... Whatever it was, it just didn't work (lol). 
Hahaha!!! Too funny!! 
Lesson learned for Mr. Manning: Stick with Omaha. It worked all season long, didn't it. 
It did! Lol 
I personally was just dumbfounded the entire game. Couldnt believe their the defense was THAT good...
Yep, me, too. It was a stunning display of football by the Seahawks as a whole. 

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Monday, February 3, 2014

Broncos in the Super Bowl: Belong or not Belong?



"It's not embarrassing at all. I would never use that word,'' [Peyton] Manning said after the game. "The word 'embarrassing' is an insulting word, to tell you the truth." 
Manning completed 34 of 49 passes for 280 yards and a touchdown pass to Demaryius Thomas, but he couldn't find a route over the Seahawks' "Legion of Boom" secondary and also threw two interceptions. The Seahawks pounded the Broncos 43-8. 
Manning's total quarterback rating of 24.4 was his lowest of the season and the worst in a Super Bowl since Rex Grossman's 7.1 in 2006. 
"We played a great team," Manning said. "We needed to play really well in order to win, and we didn't come anywhere close to that."
Manning, to be compared to Grossman, big ouch.

Reference: Peyton Manning insulted by question.

I posted the following on Google+, and it generated a discussion:

No matter how you slice-and-dice it, Broncos clearly didn't belong in SB48.
Yes they did, they were the best team in the AFC. They didn't measure up to Seattle and rightfully got their arses handed to them, but that's a different topic.
The Broncos earned the right to be there. They just weren't ready for the Seahawks. As Sean said, that's a different topic.
Of course, you're right, gents. I'm just trying to get a better grip on what happened to the Broncos. No question about how great of a team they are, but the Saints and 49ers lost to, but at least played competitively against, the Seahawks. The Seahawks didn't just spring 43 points on them in one play, so the Broncos had so many opportunities to score and get back in the game... but ultimately couldn't do it. At the end of the day, I would've enjoyed a 49ers-Seahawks Super Bowl much better. 
So no one is allowed a bad/off day? You guys are ridiculous. 
How so Brian? Being ridiculous by saying Denver did belong in the Super Bowl but didn't measure up to Seattle? Explain yourself please because you sound ridiculous. 
Ah, Ron. Yes, he is wrong a lot. But he readily admits it :)
lol... actually what I admitted most to, more specifically, is that belonging in the Super Bowl and playing well in it are two different things. To me, this lopsided win by the Seahawks is a reminder that athletes are all human beings and that in any given game we may see the best and the worst of them. I love sports, and I try to understand more deeply what happens in a game and how athletes perform. So I watch, read and listen as much as I can.

The Broncos and Seahawks both had the league-best records and played well in the playoffs. They were great in different ways, but otherwise evenly matched. A lot of attention was put on the No. 1 offense vs. No. 1 defense. But they were even as well on the flipside: Broncos, 19th on defense; Seahawks, 17th on offense... in terms of yardage. So the scenario was set for a really competitive Super Bowl...

Then, it was not, and I was scratching my head afterwards: how... why...?

I scanned through all the Super Bowls, and except for a handful, they were all pretty evenly played games... judging simply by the scores. So, history bears itself out that the NFL playoff structure does work (I was questioning before): By and large, the two best teams end up facing each other in the big game.

ESPN John Clayton, known as The Professor, said something like: The best defense will trump the best offense in any given game. I don't know, yet, if this is true in general, but on the face of it, it was true for the Seahawks and Broncos. (This, too, is another story, because it was actually a team beatdown: Seahawks' offense and special teams played very well, not just their defense.)

So, gents, if you didn't like this post, then you really won't like my quip on Twitter after the game: That the Broncos should be put on Super Bowl probation, or something. They're 2-5 now. Yeah, I don't think they belong (lol).

No problem with your post, it's social media, people post their opinions.
Yep, definitely. Thanks, Sean.

I read how the Seahawks prepared to defend the Broncos, and knew to avoid, or minimize, blitzing. Manning apparently has a history of burning defenses that blitz. Their D linemen were amazingly fast; it seemed like they were in the gaps, before the O linemen could blink their eyes. Seahawks even dropped a lineman into coverage on occasion - an amazing strategy.

On the whole, though, what's your take on how two pretty evenly matched teams play so lopsidedly?

I think it was a beat down by seattle's defense. Their DL simply overwhelmed Denver's OL. They hit manning early and often, got their hands on a couple balls and stuffed the run. The coverage took away anything deep, dictated him to go underneath, and immediately hammered whoever caught it. I don't think there where many yards after catch. It was one of the most dominating defense games I've seen in a long time.
Oh, and Seattle's offense helped by not turning the ball over, extending drives and getting some points. I don't know the time of possession but I'm guessing it was big in favor of Seattle and by the end of the game Denver's defense was gassed.
It was definitely a stunning performance to watching. Seattle put on a football clinic for everyone to learn from.

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Friday, January 31, 2014

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

NFL and Super Bowl Rake In the Big Bucks



Unlike Major League Baseball apparently, the National Football League draws a large national audience.  Perhaps because the gridiron offers up such a limited supply of games, compared to its brethren on the diamond, each NFL game, especially the Big Game, taps into that pool of football fanatics.

Thank you for reading, let me know what you think, and enjoy the Super Bowl!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Friday, January 24, 2014

Story of Megan Pettine and the Cleveland Browns


(image credit)
Who is Megan Pettine, and why has her tweet caught the NFL by storm?

She is the daughter of Mike Pettine, the recently hired Head Coach of the Cleveland Browns.  Our world, and consequently what we say, have become so jaded, that by many standards, it is a positively innocuous tweet.  Put different names to this father and daughter duo and to the organization he was interviewing with, and that tweet would've slipped into oblivion, just as quickly as she had tapped it out.  

But that's the rub, isn't it.  Good or bad, any NFL team is hardly likely to escape the attention of fans and the media, especially if there is something even a smidgen scandalous about any one of them.  My hope is that the Browns take a step back, and reflect on its brand vis-a-vis its target audience and the larger media.  They're not exactly hot stuff in that regard.  In fact, Forbes ranked the Browns 22nd among The Most Valuable NFL Teams in 2013.
(image credit)
Mike Pettine was expecting it, so he didn't balk when the last question asked at his first news conference as Cleveland Browns head coach was about his 19-year-old daughter's unfortunate post on Twitter following his first interview. 
As Pettine talked, it became clear how social media and the Internet can make life difficult. 
After tweeting excitedly on Jan. 16 that her father would be going back for a second interview with the Browns, Megan Pettine added: "Its the browns.. But hey, still pretty cool!" 
The tweet was later deleted, and the account deactivated. 
Still, it didn't help the Browns' already battered image. 
Pettine said when the tweet went viral and was picked up by websites that follows the NFL, Megan called her father in tears. 
"She was mortified," Pettine said. "Called me hysterically crying one day after it happened." 
Pettine said a very long father-daughter chat followed. 
"She learned a very valuable lesson in the power of social media," he said. 
Pettine added that Megan's formative years were spent in Baltimore "where she was trained to not be a Browns fan." 
"So I hope that we can give her a little leniency that way," he said. 
As he spoke, it was evident how difficult the experience was for father and daughter, and how close they are. 
"She sent me a text this morning," Pettine said on the day of his hiring, "that I think would have made most fathers cry."
Reference: Pettine's daughter 'learned lesson'.

Social media is something we've known about, and participated in, for several years now.  From fomenting the Arab Spring revolution a couple of year ago, to raking Justin Bieber over the coals this week, social media is powerful indeed and we are just beginning, I'd say, to come to grips with it.

I love this little article from ESPN, above, because how we come to grips with that power can be a very personal, family matter.  My wife and I have a 15-year old daughter ourselves, and we hate for any young person to feel so upset like that.

But live and learn, eh.

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Friday, January 17, 2014

Peyton Manning v Tom Brady for the AFC


November 24th 2013
Before their last match-up, Manning had never lost a game in which he led by at least 22 points, going 50-0 in the regular season in that scenario, and 2-0 in the playoffs. So 52-0 with that type of three-touchdown-plus lead (the Broncos led 24-0 at halftime), and for all places for that streak to end, it came in Manning's personal House of Horrors (Gillette Stadium), against Brady, his longtime nemesis. We keep billing it as the best quarterback rivalry in NFL history, but Brady keeps making sure it's pretty one-sided. It's 10-4 in Brady's favor, and No. 12 had by far the better night, completing 34-of-50 passes for 344 yards, with three touchdowns, no interceptions and a 107.4 passer rating. Manning turned in his worst game of the season, throwing for just 150 yards on 19-of-34 passing, with two touchdowns, one interception and a 70.4 rating. As the two prepare for Brady vs. Manning XV in this weekend's AFC Championship game in Denver, SI.com looks back at the Brady-Manning rivalry, starting from the beginning...
Reference and image credits: The Brady-Manning Rivalry.

This coming Sunday, two football legends, very much in the making, are playing each other, yet again, this time for the AFC championship.  Of course Peyton Manning and Tom Brady don't actually go head-to-head with each other, but why not, if only for the sake of juxtaposing two quarterbacks who stand shoulder-to-shoulder in some rarefied football atmosphere.

I missed that November 24th 2013 game between the Broncos and Patriots (photo, above), but it has to be one of Manning's most devastating, stunning defeats at the hands of Brady & Co.

The Brady-Manning Rivalry
September 30th 2001
The Brady-Manning Rivalry
October 21st 2001
The Brady-Manning Rivalry
September 9th 2004
The Brady-Manning Rivalry
January 16th 2005
The Brady-Manning Rivalry
November 7th 2005
The Brady-Manning Rivalry
November 5th 2006
The Brady-Manning Rivalry
November 4th 2007
The Brady-Manning Rivalry
November 15th 2009
The Brady-Manning Rivalry
November 21st 2010
October 7th 2012
This weekend, I'm rooting for the Patroits and the 49ers to win their respective conferences, and play head-to-head in Super Bowl XLVIII on February 2nd 2014.  But with the Seahawks in the mix, I'm not wedded to any particular teams, really, coming out of this weekend's matchups.  All four are superb teams, and all I look forward to are good, competitive football among them.  

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD