Monday, November 26, 2012

Fired, Wired and Hired in Los Angeles


Mike Brown, fired

Mike Brown
The Los Angeles Lakers wasted no time in this young NBA season. They invested heavily in building up the team during the off-season, and they must win another championship this year. This is the sort of pressure CEOs and their organizations experience, and if they don't produce, they're out much quicker than they can imagine. Coach Mike Brown obviously found himself on the short end of the stick, as the beloved 'Lake Show' stumbled badly at the season's start.

Reference:  With no time to waste, Lakers make right decision in firing Mike Brown

Phil Jackson, wired. 

Phil Jackson
I am a Chicago Bulls fan, and Phil Jackson was singularly responsible for an outstanding 1990s, what, with two 'three-peat' championships. He followed that up with a 'three-peat' and a 're-peat' with the Los Angeles Lakers in the 2000s. That's a remarkable 11 championships in two decades of basketball, where the odds of any coach winning just one is virtually miniscule. I love the Zen Master, so it seemed that he was all set to return to the bench to bring that storied 'Lake Show' back on the championship track. Seemed.

Reference:  West Side: Jackson was Lakers' man

Mike D'Antoni, hired. 

Mike D'Antoni
Mike D'Antoni left the New York Knicks in a fiasco around Carmelo Anthony last year. I don't follow his coaching or his teams, but was shocked to hear that the Los Angeles top brass chose him over Phil Jackson. If an NBA championship were a Nobel Prize, there is absolutely no other coach in the league you'd seek for advice, research, leadership and results than the Zen Master. He has 11 such 'prizes.' Still, this article opened my eyes to the prospects that Mike D'Antoni was actually a better fit with the Lakers and offered a better chance for that 'prize.'

Reference:  East Side: D'Antoni was right pick

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Thursday, November 22, 2012

For the Love of Hockey

My family and I were the third of three sets of close relatives to emigrate from Manila to Chicago in 1968.  Three of my cousins and I were about the same age, and we were all active boys.  Hockey was the first sport we played together, and it was on the baseball diamond turned skating rink at Smith's Field on the west side.  They managed to get proper hockey skates, while I happened to wear figure skates that had parallel blades and customary teeth at the front. 

A Filipino boy doesn't usually find himself on the ice, so it was my first effort at skating.  As it turned out, my natural skating motion was more that of a hockey player than a figure skater.  Practically, this meant I stumbled often on those darn teeth and sometimes onto my face.  I was too graceless at first and too stiff from the cold Chicago winter to brace myself from the fall.  With proper skates not quite in the offing at the time, I wore a football helmet to keep more bruises at bay.

Within three years, all of our parents moved us to the suburbs, and I was playing little league hockey in Arlington Heights.  With a full complement of gear and uniform, I came to really love hockey, even as my cousins ventured away from the sport.  I loved the speed of being on the ice, and the skating motion had a grace that walking or running couldn't quite match.  I became good enough at it to win two trophies in that first year of organized play.

From old heartbreak to new thrill

Forty years ago the NHL had little play on TV.  That was fine, as we had sports news highlights and our beloved Tribune.  One of my best family-cum-sports memories was of my father and me, listening on the radio to Game 7 of the Stanley Cup, between our Chicago Blackhawks and the Montreal Canadiens.  Picture this.  It was a steamy May evening in 1971, as we sat on the third floor porch in the back of our Chicago apartment, the radio situated between us.

Oh, that game was a heartbreak!  It was a hard-fought series between two great teams that were very well-matched for Lord Stanley.  Still, the Blackhawks were up 2-0, then 3-2, in the series.  They were even winning 2-0 in that Game 7, before the Canadiens scored 3 unanswered goals to win on our home ice.
      

We Blackhawks fans had to wait 39 years, before our guys could hoist Lord Stanley high above the ice (2010).  I was living in Dubai, and it was an Australian friend who said, "Hey Ronnie, congratulations on your Stanley Cup!"  "It was a boyhood thrill," I smiled at Lance.

Blackhawks Classics during the lockout

So it's with displeasure that there is no NHL right now.  After consecutive management-labor disputes with the NFL and the NBA last year, the NHL followed suit this year with its lockout.  Three major play stoppages in a relatively short period of time don't bode well for American professional sports, but this matter warrants study for another article.   

Like scores of sports fans across the world, we Americans love watching our athletes have at it on the field, court and rink.  So I am grateful that our local Comcast Sportsnet is airing Blackhawks Classics. 

It makes perfect sense, doesn't it.  TV executives surely can work out agreements to air more of such games.  From those involved directly in the sport, to what I call auxiliary businesses, and of course us fans, it's a complex but exciting ecology that we've all fashioned.  Bars and restaurants can show those games.  Perhaps even a couple of vendors can be on hand.  Some advertisers would be glad to get on the bandwagon.  All of this is already going on, for sure, but I think more of it can take place and thus benefit a lot more people.  

That heartbreak series, notwithstanding, my father and I would love to watch every game of that 1971 championship.  From listening to a staticky radio, to watching on his super-HD large-screen TV, the obligatory beers on hand, of course, we'd be thrilled.

Life would be good.

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Friday, November 16, 2012

Bulls Joakim Noah in Burger Mode

The Chicago Bears have Peanut Tillman in strip-the-football beast mode.  The Chicago Bulls have Joakim Noah going beast mode, too.  Averaging nearly a double-double with 16.0 points and 9.8 rebounds, and generally bounding up and down the court as if he were still overcoming the acne years of adolescence.  

This article isn't about his all-star play, though, but that burger heave-ho in the waning seconds of a recent game with the Orlando Magic.  "Stick with this one, because it's hilarious," Ben Golliver of Sports Illustrated wrote, and I'll second that motion. 

Some Magic players were in a haughty uproar about it.  One of them hoped that such a despicable act never recur on hallowed basketball courts.  Oh, the horror of Noah trying to win a free burger for the fans!

Coach Tom Thibodeau apparently gave Noah a talking-to as well, though as usual he's discreet and respectful with what he shares in the media.

Anyone else pissed off about this?

Well, I'm here to tell you, Take a chill pill, man, and give the guy a break!

NBA is a business

I'm sure there are many basketball purists out there who do talk about respecting the game and following its conventions, written and unwritten.  But pure has to be defined with the media-rich, multimillion-dollar stakes in mind.  One reason the NBA has been so successful is its marketing and promotions campaign, and the Bulls struck a great deal when McDonald's agreed to give the fans a free Big Mac, if the team broke 100 points.  

By the way, the Bulls are hardly a scoring machine.  They're cut in the mold of Coach Thibs, who's instilled a defense-first mindset among his players.  So maybe the marketing genius in the Bulls organization ought to reset the threshold with Mickey D's to something like, say, 90 points.    

No harm done


Look, Noah is deadly serious about his game, but is a spirited presence on the court.  He has a quirky personality, too.  It's what makes him entertaining to watch.  So when that quirkiness gets the better of him, now and then, I say, So what?

That game with the Magic was well on-hand anyway.  No way they could've overcome a 6-point deficit in those closing seconds, so Noah's maligned three-point heave was actually a harmless thing and he meant no disrespect with it.

Especially for a guy whose every moment on- and off-the-court is a bad-hair day. 

Everyone loves a giveaway

The lowest paid NBA player probably makes more money in one year than do the vast majority of fans watching them in their stadium, drinking at the bar, or lounging on the couch.  But here's the kicker, It's fans, like those who were rallying for a free Big Mac, who help inflate the bulging wallets on those players' behinds.

I say Noah was actually awesome for trying to trigger that giveaway.  True, there were 20,000 fans disappointed, as Golliver wrote, but they all loved him for the try.

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Saturday, November 3, 2012

Not Fair for Richard Dent to Blame Mike Ditka

Richard Dent blames Mike Ditka for the Chicago Bears' failure to win another Vince Lombardi trophy, after such a crushing victory in Super Bowl XX.  They were poised to win at least two more, and it was very disappointing and frustrating to watch them fall short.  Repeatedly.

Ditka needed to adapt his style

My first reaction, honestly, was to agree with him.

The fiery, in-your-face style of Da Coach worked perfectly with his team.  Just one loss in a dominant 1985-1986 season, and just 10 points surrendered through an unrelenting playoff march.  But to sustain that championship run required a more flexible, soft-pedaled tact, I thought, at least in some situations and with some players.  A CEO who succeeds at starting up or turning around a company through a hard-nosed approach has to shift gears over time, and focus more on balancing and reconciling multiple, perhaps competing stakeholder interests.  Ditka didn't adapt.

Ditka is an unrivaled winner


My second reaction was more measured and thoughtful, as I decided to research the matter.

Ditka's winning percentage of .631 over 11 seasons (1982 - 1992) makes him the unrivaled winningest Bears Head Coach in the post-George Halas era.  That's to the present season with Lovie Smith, sports fans!  Even Papa Bear's record in his fourth stint at the helm (1958 - 1967) fell short of Iron Mike's at .588.

So anyone can call Ditka any name, but 'loser' cannot be one of them. 

Jim McMahon was the starting QB, and played in more games than any other backup, in the three seasons after their Super Bowl.  The Punky QB was often injured, unfortunately, and never seemed to regain the magic touch he had in the run-up to the Super Bowl.

So the Doug Flutie bit that Dent focused on was, at worst, a blip on the radar.  Hardly anything that could be pinned on Da Coach.

Ditka led the Bears to seven playoff appearances during his stint, and the team had the following regular season records:
  1. 1984 - 1985 (10 - 6)
  2. 1985 - 1986 (15 - 1)
  3. 1986 - 1987 (14 - 2)
  4. 1987 - 1988 (11 - 4)
  5. 1988 - 1989 (12 - 4)
  6. 1990 - 1991 (11 - 5) 
  7. 1991 - 1992 (11 - 5)
You see, they were indeed poised to win multiple Super Bowls.  Instead, they came away with a positively mediocre .500 record in these post-seasons:  6 - 6.

Choke job in the playoffs

Ah, there's the rub.

There are teams, maybe just certain players, who are beasts during the regular season, but are more like lame ducks in the playoffs.  They struggle to show up, or they simply choke!  Think:  Greg Maddox, Chicago Cubs.  Think:  Peyton Manning, Indianapolis Colts (cf. his brother Eli).  Think more recently, way premature playoff exits for top teams (2011 - 2012):  Greenbay Packers (football), Vancouver Canucks (hockey), and Chicago Bulls (basketball).

Only athletes and coaches can speak directly to this, while the rest of us can only imagine it.  Playoffs aren't  just more intense, more physical, more daunting than the regular season.  But they say it's a different atmosphere altogether.  Almost like an altered sport that requires athletes to perform with an even more ungodly fortitude, discipline and skill.   

A friend on Facebook reminded me that defensive genius, Buddy Ryan, and Mike Ditka were feuding through their Super Bowl run.  Apparently Ditka was none too happy, when the players hoisted Ryan on their shoulders as well, after their defensive clamp-down of the Patriots.  Maybe that was a reason for the Bears' one-and-done, as Ryan fled for Philadelphia in 1986 and with him the vaunted 46 defense.  

Many reasons for the Bears' one-and-done

We may never know the exact reason for it, actually.  But here are some points I am certain about:
  • No one reason accounted for it, but multiple reasons.
  • It was team failure to show up, when it mattered most. 
  • It is patently unfair to pin this on Ditka, as Dent just did.
But for one magical season, the Chicago Bears - characters and all - gave us fans the thrill of a lifetime!

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Sources for my facts and figures are below.  I invite my readers to correct anything I got wrong.

List of Chicago Bears Seasons
List of Chicago Bears Head Coaches
List of Chicago Bears Starting QBs

Thursday, November 1, 2012

LeBron James' Formula for Success

LeBron James has had an awesome year, with a coveted NBA championship and Olympic gold medal on hand.  And the year is not over, yet.

No one can deny this athlete's ungodly talent, but it's his personality - words and actions - that seems to land him in disfavor among fans time and time again.  Touting serial capture of the Larry O'Brien trophy on stage with his partners in crime, fellow Miami Heat Dwayne Wade and Chris Bosch, was arrogant to a fault.  Then, until the playoff run this past season, he was the quintessential shrinking violet, if not David Copperfield act,  in the fourth quarter.


These are certainly reasons I dislike LeBron.  But the main reason is, I am a Bulls fan, and his dreaded Heat ushered our team right out of the 2011 conference finals.

I was talking to a friend soon after the NBA finals this year, and she clearly wasn't past the hating of LeBron or the Heat.  "But you have to admit," I said, "the dude was beast mode!"

For all his veteran years in the NBA, I often forget that LeBron is still a young man.  I remind myself that he has quite a lot of maturing to do.  A 'man-child,' one ESPN analyst called him.  This pulls me back from wading into full-on, hate-on LeBron waters. 

Playing it differently

Einstein purportedly said, Madness is doing the same thing over and over, and expecting different results.  So what was different for LeBron?  Here he is with answers, in a deft, thoughtful interview with ESPN Michael Wilbon:  Part 1 and Part 2.

This is a process I call 'extracting the algorithms.'  Essentially, it's a deeper dive into the underlying dynamics and reasons why a situation is working or not working.  His goal was clear as day, but obviously he needed to re-examine both his play and personality, if he wanted to avoid the fate of Karl Malone or Charles Barclay:  stellar career, sans championship.

We are not machines, so we cannot just pop the hood open and check our engine.  Flaws and limits are the essence of who we are, but these are sometimes difficult to get at.  So doing a deep dive and going at it differently are easier said than done. But it's a must to gain a better measure of success. 

LeBron disconnected and reflected

The underbelly of our technologized world is that we are sometimes so tethered to our devices, as to be effectively shackled from doing anything else.  It helps to turn these off, and read those anachronistic things called books, as LeBron did, in order to free himself enough to turn inward.  To his credit, it worked.

But I'd like to highlight a handful things from the interview. 

1. Self-reflect regularly


Mindfulness, or zen mind, is what martial artists are often schooled to attain.  It's being open and thoughtful about what their situation truly is.  Our situation is not a static thing, but rather, for an athlete, it is a shifting, often unpredictable thing.  So turning inward now and then serves to keep us in the flow of that situation and keep us in a mindful state outside of it. 

In cutaways during the interview, we see LeBron with his eyes closed or pouring over a book, in a deeply meditative state.  

2.  Do only what works

How many times have you seen friends or family doing things, which don't really work, even for their own stated purpose.  Sure, join a glam health club and dish out beaucoup bucks.  But having done so doesn't lead to fitness or weight loss, because we may be traveling often for work and we have an active family life on the weekend.  So there is no time for the club, yet we keep renewing the membership, right?

We don't know all that LeBron went through in his personal life to finally happen upon things that worked for him, but clearly he kept at it.  Again, it's an imperfect process and it often takes time.  But in our self-reflection, we must be open and honest enough to acknowledge when something we thought was working actually isn't working. 

3.  Balance things

If I may take the liberty of expanding on what LeBron meant by "balance" in the interview, it's this:  We must keep things in perspective, and not get caught in just one thing or another.

The reality is, basketball is a complex sport.  Yes, it's absolutely spot-on to say that it's a team sport.  In this light, it's ludicrous to focus on individual stat lines, isn't it.  Yet, that sport is comprised of very real individuals.  Some would-be inspirational posts on Facebook tout the idea that there is no 'I' in Team, and I say in retort, Hell, yeah, there is most definitely a lot of 'I's in Team!

So it's avoiding the simplistic characterizations of team versus individual, but acknowledging both and even reveling in the intricacy of their dynamics.  I argue that zen-master Phil Jackson's repeated success as a coach has to do with (a) his empathic insight into the likes of Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant; (b) his astute grasp of basketball as a team sport; and (c) his deft weaving of these individuals into a unique, seamless fabric we call a winning formula.  

LeBron knows full well that the things he did differently were in relation to, and in the context of, playing for the Heat.  

4.  Tap into a formula

I often help my daughter with her math homework.  When she was in third grader, her language abilities were at a high school level.  Math was her relative weakness, though she still tested at fifth grade level back then.  In my absence, she often struggled with it.

I helped her think through problems, especially those presented as a narrative, which apparently all young students dread.  She had formulas at her disposal, of course.  But I helped her grasp what the problem was about, first of all, and then which formula applied.  Moreover, I helped her understand these formulas better, so she had insight into their derivation.

I'm happy to add that as of last year, as a seventh grader, she tested in the 98th percentile for math.  

In my conceptual framework, Theory of Algorithms, a formula is an algorithm.  Once you've extracted the right one, then you can use it again in different situations.  Which is what LeBron is poised to do, now that the new NBA season has started.

Which is bad news, once again, for my beloved Bulls (sigh). 

A point of emphasis, in closing

You have to make sure, it's the right algorithms you're extracting vis-a-vis your situation, just as my daughter had to use the right formulas for particular problems.

If you come away from this LeBron interview thinking that turning off your iPhone 5 or delving into 'War and Peace' will lift your success to the next level, you haven't extracted the right algorithms. Instead, the right ones, which were not so explicit in the interview, are self-reflecting regularly and teasing out what actually works for you.

So you may use LeBron's formula, but how you apply it in your sport may be entirely different from what he did.

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD